Provisional insolvencyPreliminary measure

Direct-Smarter Technology GmbH

Case number: 7 IN 160/26Court: Hansestadt StendalState: Sachsen-Anhalt
Sign in to follow
Stage
Preliminary measure
Bid window
~47 days left
Insolvenzgeld window
Court / region
Hansestadt Stendal
Sachsen-Anhalt
Industry
Software & SaaS
verwalter
Prof. Dr. Christoph Alexander Jacobi
Show administrator contact — free

Free registration. You'll then see the name, firm and contact details of the administrator handling this case.

The record

Case summary

Insolvency proceedings concerning Direct-Smarter Technology GmbH (Gommern) were applied for on 2026-08-03 at the Hansestadt Stendal (case no. 7 IN 160/26). Procedure type: Provisional insolvency. Prof. Dr. Christoph Alexander Jacobi was appointed as insolvency administrator. Direct-Smarter Technology GmbH is a registered GmbH.

Facts from the official notice and register that change how you approach this case.

Provisional insolvencyHRB HRB 34662Bid window ~47 days

Want to hear when this case moves?

Follow it and we email you when a new notice is published, a deadline closes in or fresh research lands. And if you are looking to buy: tell us your sector, size and region once, and we score this case — and every new one — against your thesis.

Sign in to follow
Official gazette entry

Full text of the §9 InsO opening decree from insolvenzbekanntmachungen.de.

7 IN 160/26 : In dem Insolvenzantragsverfahren über das Vermögen der Direct-Smarter Technology GmbH, Industriepark Str. A-9, 39245 Gommern (AG Stendal, HRB 34662), vertr. d: […]. Verfügungen der Antragstellerin sind nur mit Zustimmung des vorläufigen Insolvenzverwalters wirksam. Zum vorläufigen InsoShow full announcement ↓
7 IN 160/26 : In dem Insolvenzantragsverfahren über das Vermögen der Direct-Smarter Technology GmbH, Industriepark Str. A-9, 39245 Gommern (AG Stendal, HRB 34662), vertr. d: […]. Verfügungen der Antragstellerin sind nur mit Zustimmung des vorläufigen Insolvenzverwalters wirksam. Zum vorläufigen Insolvenzverwalter ist Rechtsanwalt […], Tel.: 0391-810563-98, Fax: 0391-810563-99 bestellt worden. Die Schuldner der Antragstellerin werden aufgefordert, nur noch unter Beachtung des Beschlusses zu leisten (§ 23 Abs. 1 S. 3 InsO). Der vollständige Beschluss kann in der Geschäftsstelle des Insolvenzgerichts eingesehen werden. Rechtsmittelbelehrung Diese Entscheidung kann durch die Antragstellerin mit der sofortigen Beschwerde angefochten werden. Darüber hinaus kann, wenn nach Art. 5 Abs. 1 der Verordnung (EU) 2015/848 das Fehlen der internationalen Zuständigkeit für die Eröffnung des Hauptinsolvenzverfahrens gerügt werden soll, die sofortige Beschwerde auch von jedem Gläubiger eingelegt werden. Sie ist innerhalb einer Notfrist von 2 Wochen bei dem Amtsgericht Stendal - Insolvenzabteilung -, Scharnhorststraße 40, 39576 Hansestadt Stendal, Elektronisches Gerichts- und Verwaltungspostfach: govello-1160135924133-000003203 einzulegen. Die Frist beginnt mit der Zustellung bzw. mit der Verkündung der Entscheidung. Soweit die Zustellung durch öffentliche Bekanntmachung erfolgt ist, beginnt sie, sobald nach dem Tage der Veröffentlichung zwei weitere Tage verstrichen sind. Erfolgt die öffentliche Bekanntmachung neben der Zustellung ist für den Beginn der Frist das frühere Ereignis maßgebend. Die Beschwerde kann durch Einreichung einer Beschwerdeschrift bei dem o. g. Gericht eingelegt oder auch zu Protokoll der Geschäftsstelle eines jeden Amtsgerichts erklärt werden, wobei es für die Einhaltung der Frist auf den Eingang bei dem o. g. Gericht ankommt. Sie ist von dem Beschwerdeführer oder seinem Bevollmächtigten zu unterzeichnen. Die Beschwerde muss die Bezeichnung des angefochtenen Beschlusses sowie die Erklärung enthalten, dass Beschwerde gegen diesen Beschluss eingelegt wird. Soll die Entscheidung nur zum Teil angefochten werden, so ist der Umfang der Anfechtung zu bezeichnen. Die Beschwerde soll begründet werden. Amtsgericht Stendal, 30.07.2026

Official announcement pursuant to § 9 InsO. Names of natural persons have been removed. Source: insolvenzbekanntmachungen.de.

Commercial register extract

Public data from the German electronic commercial register (AD extract).

Legal name
Direct-Smarter Technology GmbH
Legal form
GmbH
Register number
HRB HRB 34662 · Amtsgericht Stendal
Registered seat
Gommern
Business address
Gommern
Business purpose
not published
Share capital
not published
Founded on
not published

Company profile

AI-generated dossier

Deal windowAct nowNotice published 45 days ago

Preliminary proceedings. The preliminary administrator is securing the estate and generally cannot transfer the business yet — but this is when the bidder list forms. Being known now is why you get the call later.

Insolvency wage cover typically runs to about 2026-11-03 — that is the clock everyone is running against.

Typical sequence under the German InsO; not legal advice and not a statement about this case. The administrator runs the process.

The full dossier sets out what the company does, what is sellable, and what went wrong. Register free to keep reading.

Synthesised from Handelsregister, Bundesanzeiger, §9 notice, web presence and news.

Continue reading — free

Key deadlines

Report meeting · buyer window
§§ 29, 156–157 InsO — the creditors' meeting decides continue vs. liquidate. Going-concern sales usually close before it.
Claim deadline · creditors'
§174 InsO — deadline for creditors to lodge claims. Not a buyer's date.
Verification meeting · creditors'
§§ 29, 176 InsO — verification of the lodged claims. A creditors' date.
External sourcesExtra verification sources — deep-linked to the right view when possible.
Administration

Administrator dossier

Prof. Dr. Christoph Alexander Jacobi
Contact details (phone, email, address)

Register for free to see the administrator's phone, email and office address.

Show contact — free registration

Does this company match your search?

Score the fit against your buyer profile — sector, region, size, deal structure.

Your personal match score for this company

Create a free buyer profile in 60 seconds and see instantly how well this company fits your sector, region and deal size.

Create buyer profile — free
What an asset deal actually carries

Buying out of an insolvency estate is an asset deal: you buy individual assets and rights, not the company. This is the checklist experienced buyers work through before they bid. We do not hold the answers for this proceeding — they come from the administrator.

  • Which assets already belong, economically, to somebody else?

    Not known — ask the administrator

    Retention of title, security assignment and leasing are the most common reason the machine in the photo is not part of the sale. The administrator may only realise what belongs to the estate (§§ 47, 51 InsO). Ask for the list of third-party claims before you value anything.

  • Are the premises part of the estate, or does everything hang on the landlord?

    Not known — ask the administrator

    With leased premises the landlord decides whether the lease transfers to you. For a location-bound business, a site you may not keep IS the deal. Establish ownership, remaining term, termination rights and the landlord's consent — in writing, before you bid.

  • Are the permits attached to the business or to a person?

    Not known — ask the administrator

    Licences, hospitality permits, Handwerksrolle registration, § 34c GewO permits, healthcare and transport approvals: some transfer with the business, others are attached to a natural person and lapse with them. For a regulated trade, a permit matrix is the first step, not the last.

  • Who actually owns the brand, the domain, the shop and the customer data?

    Not known — ask the administrator

    Domains are frequently registered to a shareholder or an agency rather than to the company, and trademarks are sometimes licensed in from a holding entity. Without the domain and the mark you are buying inventory, not a business. Customer data needs a separate data-protection assessment — a customer base is not a chattel.

  • § 613a BGB: which employment relationships come with the assets?

    Not known — ask the administrator

    Taking over a business or part of one means stepping into the existing employment contracts, insolvency or not. What insolvency changes is liability for OLD obligations: for claims that arose before the proceeding opened, settled BAG case law says the buyer does not carry them. The social plan is capped by § 123 InsO at 2.5 monthly salaries per employee, and at one third of the estate that would otherwise be distributed. Model headcount × monthly salary × 2.5 as the ceiling, then test the one-third limit against the estate.

  • Which contracts does the business need in order to still run on Monday?

    Not known — ask the administrator

    Under § 103 InsO the administrator elects whether to perform contracts neither side has completed, and in an asset deal customer and supplier contracts transfer only with the counterparty's consent. Ask which five contracts the business cannot run without — ERP, payment provider, fulfilment, key supplier, key customer — and settle novation before closing.

Why buying from the estate is cleaner than an ordinary acquisition

  • § 75(2) AO — the successor's liability for the predecessor's business taxes expressly does not apply to an acquisition out of an insolvency estate. Buying a healthy company, that is one of the largest risks you carry.
  • § 25 HGB — successor liability on continuing the trade name is routinely excluded on an acquisition from the estate, and on the prevailing view does not attach in the first place; put the exclusion in the contract regardless.
  • Pre-opening employment liabilities do not travel with the buyer under settled BAG case law — the running business transfers, the debts stay in the estate.

General information on German law. Not legal advice, and not a statement about this company. For the actual case only the administrator and the purchase agreement decide.

Similar proceedings

Similar proceedings

Questions & guidance

Frequently asked questions

Is Direct-Smarter Technology GmbH insolvent?+

Insolvency proceedings concerning Direct-Smarter Technology GmbH (Gommern) were applied for on 2026-08-03 at the Hansestadt Stendal (case no. 7 IN 160/26).

Which court handles the insolvency of Direct-Smarter Technology GmbH and what is the case number?+

The competent court is the Hansestadt Stendal. The proceedings are conducted under case number 7 IN 160/26.

What is the company registration number of Direct-Smarter Technology GmbH?+

Direct-Smarter Technology GmbH is recorded in the official register under HRB HRB 34662, kept at the Amtsgericht Stendal.

Who is the insolvency administrator of Direct-Smarter Technology GmbH?+

Prof. Dr. Christoph Alexander Jacobi, Magdeburg was appointed by the court as insolvency administrator. Buyers and creditors contact the administrator directly.

Can Direct-Smarter Technology GmbH or its assets be acquired?+

In many insolvency proceedings the business operations or individual assets are sold via a transferring restructuring (asset deal). Interested buyers approach the appointed insolvency administrator; the official facts and deadlines above are the starting point.

What now? Buyer's guide

How does an insolvency asset deal work? What deadlines matter? When is the best moment to talk to the administrator?