Standard insolvencyInsolvency openedEarly phase · 0d

RASH GmbH

Case number: 810 IN 179/24 R-5-6Court: Frankfurt am MainState: Hessen
Sign in to follow
Stage
Insolvency opened
day 0
Bid window
~91 days left
Insolvenzgeld window
Court / region
Frankfurt am Main
Hessen
Industry
verwalter
Rechtsanwalt Wolfram Feuerhake
Show administrator contact — free

Free registration. You'll then see the name, firm and contact details of the administrator handling this case.

The record

Case summary

Insolvency proceedings concerning RASH GmbH were opened on 2026-09-18 at the Frankfurt am Main (case no. 810 IN 179/24 R-5-6). Procedure type: Standard insolvency. Rechtsanwalt Wolfram Feuerhake was appointed as insolvency administrator.

Facts from the official notice and register that change how you approach this case.

Standard insolvencyHRB HRB 126378Bid window ~91 days

Want to hear when this case moves?

Follow it and we email you when a new notice is published, a deadline closes in or fresh research lands. And if you are looking to buy: tell us your sector, size and region once, and we score this case — and every new one — against your thesis.

Sign in to follow
Official gazette entry

Full text of the §9 InsO opening decree from insolvenzbekanntmachungen.de.

810 IN 179/24 R: In dem Insolvenzverfahren RASH GmbH, Mainzer Landstraße 620, 65933 Frankfurt am Main (AG Frankfurt am Main, HRB 126378), vertreten durch: […]. Zum Insolvenzverwalter wurde bestellt: Rechtsanwalt […] am Taunus, Tel.: 06196/ 90 28 98, Fax: 06196/ 90 28 97, E-Mail: rechtsanwalt@feuerhaShow full announcement ↓
810 IN 179/24 R: In dem Insolvenzverfahren RASH GmbH, Mainzer Landstraße 620, 65933 Frankfurt am Main (AG Frankfurt am Main, HRB 126378), vertreten durch: […]. Zum Insolvenzverwalter wurde bestellt: Rechtsanwalt […] am Taunus, Tel.: 06196/ 90 28 98, Fax: 06196/ 90 28 97, E-Mail: [email protected], Internet: www.feuerhake.de. Der Schuldnerin wird die Verfügung über ihr gegenwärtiges und zukünftiges Vermögen für die Dauer des Insolvenzverfahrens verboten und dem Insolvenzverwalter übertragen. Schuldbefreiende Leistungen an die Schuldnerin können nach dem Eröffnungszeitpunkt nicht mehr erfolgen, wird gleichwohl an die Schuldnerin geleistet und gelangen die Mittel nicht zur Masse, besteht die Gefahr der nochmaligen Leistungsverpflichtung gegenüber dem Insolvenzverwalter. Hinweise: Gläubiger, die elektronische Dokumente über einen sicheren elektronischen Übermittlungsweg (§ 130a der Zivilprozessordnung) empfangen können, können unter Angabe des über einen solchen Weg erreichbaren Postfachs ihre Zustimmung zu elektronischen Zustellungen erklären. Die Möglichkeit der elektronischen Zustellung an die in § 173 Absatz 2 der Zivilproessordnung Genannten bleibt unberührt. Löschungsfristen: Die Löschung von Veröffentlichungen in einem elektronischen Informations- und Kommunikationssystem erfolgt nach § 3 InsoBekV. Die Löschungsfristen sind folgende: Veröffentlichungen, die im Antrags- oder Insolvenzverfahren erfolgt sind, werden spätestens sechs Monate nach der Aufhebung oder der Rechtskraft der Einstellung des Insolvenzverfahrens gelöscht. Wird das Verfahren nicht eröffnet, beginnt die Frist mit der Aufhebung der veröffentlichten Sicherungsmaßnahmen. Sonstige Veröffentlichungen nach der Insolvenzordnung werden einen Monat nach dem ersten Tag der Veröffentlichung gelöscht. Insolvenzgericht, Frankfurt am Main den 17.09.2026

Official announcement pursuant to § 9 InsO. Names of natural persons have been removed. Source: insolvenzbekanntmachungen.de.

Company profile

Key deadlines

Report meeting · buyer window
§§ 29, 156–157 InsO — the creditors' meeting decides continue vs. liquidate. Going-concern sales usually close before it.
Claim deadline · creditors'
§174 InsO — deadline for creditors to lodge claims. Not a buyer's date.
Verification meeting · creditors'
§§ 29, 176 InsO — verification of the lodged claims. A creditors' date.
External sourcesExtra verification sources — deep-linked to the right view when possible.
Administration

Administrator dossier

Rechtsanwalt Wolfram Feuerhake
Contact details (phone, email, address)

Register for free to see the administrator's phone, email and office address.

Show contact — free registration

Does this company match your search?

Score the fit against your buyer profile — sector, region, size, deal structure.

Your personal match score for this company

Create a free buyer profile in 60 seconds and see instantly how well this company fits your sector, region and deal size.

Create buyer profile — free
What an asset deal actually carries

Buying out of an insolvency estate is an asset deal: you buy individual assets and rights, not the company. This is the checklist experienced buyers work through before they bid. We do not hold the answers for this proceeding — they come from the administrator.

  • Which assets already belong, economically, to somebody else?

    Not known — ask the administrator

    Retention of title, security assignment and leasing are the most common reason the machine in the photo is not part of the sale. The administrator may only realise what belongs to the estate (§§ 47, 51 InsO). Ask for the list of third-party claims before you value anything.

  • Are the premises part of the estate, or does everything hang on the landlord?

    Not known — ask the administrator

    With leased premises the landlord decides whether the lease transfers to you. For a location-bound business, a site you may not keep IS the deal. Establish ownership, remaining term, termination rights and the landlord's consent — in writing, before you bid.

  • Are the permits attached to the business or to a person?

    Not known — ask the administrator

    Licences, hospitality permits, Handwerksrolle registration, § 34c GewO permits, healthcare and transport approvals: some transfer with the business, others are attached to a natural person and lapse with them. For a regulated trade, a permit matrix is the first step, not the last.

  • Who actually owns the brand, the domain, the shop and the customer data?

    Not known — ask the administrator

    Domains are frequently registered to a shareholder or an agency rather than to the company, and trademarks are sometimes licensed in from a holding entity. Without the domain and the mark you are buying inventory, not a business. Customer data needs a separate data-protection assessment — a customer base is not a chattel.

  • § 613a BGB: which employment relationships come with the assets?

    Not known — ask the administrator

    Taking over a business or part of one means stepping into the existing employment contracts, insolvency or not. What insolvency changes is liability for OLD obligations: for claims that arose before the proceeding opened, settled BAG case law says the buyer does not carry them. The social plan is capped by § 123 InsO at 2.5 monthly salaries per employee, and at one third of the estate that would otherwise be distributed. Model headcount × monthly salary × 2.5 as the ceiling, then test the one-third limit against the estate.

  • Which contracts does the business need in order to still run on Monday?

    Not known — ask the administrator

    Under § 103 InsO the administrator elects whether to perform contracts neither side has completed, and in an asset deal customer and supplier contracts transfer only with the counterparty's consent. Ask which five contracts the business cannot run without — ERP, payment provider, fulfilment, key supplier, key customer — and settle novation before closing.

Why buying from the estate is cleaner than an ordinary acquisition

  • § 75(2) AO — the successor's liability for the predecessor's business taxes expressly does not apply to an acquisition out of an insolvency estate. Buying a healthy company, that is one of the largest risks you carry.
  • § 25 HGB — successor liability on continuing the trade name is routinely excluded on an acquisition from the estate, and on the prevailing view does not attach in the first place; put the exclusion in the contract regardless.
  • Pre-opening employment liabilities do not travel with the buyer under settled BAG case law — the running business transfers, the debts stay in the estate.

General information on German law. Not legal advice, and not a statement about this company. For the actual case only the administrator and the purchase agreement decide.

Similar proceedings

Similar proceedings

Questions & guidance

Frequently asked questions

Is RASH GmbH insolvent?+

Insolvency proceedings concerning RASH GmbH were opened on 2026-09-18 at the Frankfurt am Main (case no. 810 IN 179/24 R-5-6).

Which court handles the insolvency of RASH GmbH and what is the case number?+

The competent court is the Frankfurt am Main. The proceedings are conducted under case number 810 IN 179/24 R-5-6.

What is the company registration number of RASH GmbH?+

RASH GmbH is recorded in the official register under HRB HRB 126378.

Who is the insolvency administrator of RASH GmbH?+

Rechtsanwalt Wolfram Feuerhake, Schwalbach am Taunus was appointed by the court as insolvency administrator. Buyers and creditors contact the administrator directly.

Can RASH GmbH or its assets be acquired?+

In many insolvency proceedings the business operations or individual assets are sold via a transferring restructuring (asset deal). Interested buyers approach the appointed insolvency administrator; the official facts and deadlines above are the starting point.

What now? Buyer's guide

How does an insolvency asset deal work? What deadlines matter? When is the best moment to talk to the administrator?