Standard insolvencyInsolvency openedMid phase · 45d

robot-machining GmbH

Case number: 8 IN 122/26Court: Offenbach am MainState: Hessen
www.robot-machining.debest match
Sign in to follow
Stage
Insolvency opened
day 45
Bid window
~47 days left
Insolvenzgeld window
Court / region
Offenbach am Main
Hessen
Industry
Manufacturing
verwalter
Florian Bandrack LL.M.
Baker Tilly Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH
Show administrator contact — free

Free registration. You'll then see the name, firm and contact details of the administrator handling this case.

The record

Case summary

Insolvency proceedings concerning robot-machining GmbH were opened on 2026-08-05 at the Offenbach am Main (case no. 8 IN 122/26). Procedure type: Standard insolvency. Florian Bandrack LL.M. (Baker Tilly Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH) was appointed as insolvency administrator.

Facts from the official notice and register that change how you approach this case.

Standard insolvencyWebsite liveHRB HRB 47609Bid window ~47 days

Want to hear when this case moves?

Follow it and we email you when a new notice is published, a deadline closes in or fresh research lands. And if you are looking to buy: tell us your sector, size and region once, and we score this case — and every new one — against your thesis.

Sign in to follow
Official gazette entry

Full text of the §9 InsO opening decree from insolvenzbekanntmachungen.de.

Amtsgericht Offenbach am Main 05.08.2026 - Insolvenzgericht - 8 IN 122/26 In dem Insolvenzverfahren über das Vermögen der robot-machining GmbH, Am Sanddorn 10, 63500 Seligenstadt (AG Offenbach am Main , HRB 47609), vertreten durch: […] wird heute um 09:03 Uhr das Insolvenzverfahren gemäß §§ 2, 3, 11Show full announcement ↓
Amtsgericht Offenbach am Main 05.08.2026 - Insolvenzgericht - 8 IN 122/26 In dem Insolvenzverfahren über das Vermögen der robot-machining GmbH, Am Sanddorn 10, 63500 Seligenstadt (AG Offenbach am Main , HRB 47609), vertreten durch: […] wird heute um 09:03 Uhr das Insolvenzverfahren gemäß §§ 2, 3, 11, 16ff InsO wegen Zahlungsunfähigkeit und Überschuldung eröffnet. Zum Insolvenzverwalter wird bestellt: Rechtsanwalt […]LL.M., Baker Tilly Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH, Brüsseler Straße 1-3, 60327 Frankfurt am Main, Tel.: 069/3660020, Fax: 069/366002-160, Internet: bakertilly.de. Mit diesem Verfahren wird das weitere 8 IN 410/26 verbunden. Das Verfahren 8 IN 122/26 führt. Der Schuldnerin wird die Verfügung über ihr gegenwärtiges und zukünftiges Vermögen für die Dauer des Insolvenzverfahrens verboten und dem Insolvenzverwalter übertragen. Schuldbefreiende Leistungen an die Schuldnerin können nach dem Eröffnungszeitpunkt nicht mehr erfolgen, wird gleichwohl an die Schuldnerin geleistet und gelangen die Mittel nicht zur Masse, besteht die Gefahr der nochmaligen Leistungsverpflichtung gegenüber dem Insolvenzverwalter. Rechtsmittelbelehrung Diese Entscheidung kann durch die Schuldnerin mit der sofortigen Beschwerde angefochten werden. Sie ist innerhalb einer Notfrist von 2 Wochen bei dem Amtsgericht Offenbach, Kaiserstraße 16-18, 63065 Offenbach am Main einzulegen. Die Frist beginnt mit der Zustellung bzw. mit der Verkündung der Entscheidung. Soweit die Zustellung durch öffentliche Bekanntmachung erfolgt ist, beginnt sie, sobald nach dem Tage der Veröffentlichung zwei weitere Tage verstrichen sind. Erfolgt die öffentliche Bekanntmachung neben der Zustellung ist für den Beginn der Frist das frühere Ereignis maßgebend. Die Beschwerde kann durch Einreichung einer Beschwerdeschrift bei bei dem o. g. Gericht eingelegt oder auch zu Protokoll der Geschäftsstelle eines jeden Amtsgerichts erklärt werden, wobei es für die Einhaltung der Frist auf den Eingang bei bei dem o. g. Gericht ankommt. Sie ist von dem Beschwerdeführer oder seinem Bevollmächtigten zu unterzeichnen. Die Beschwerde muss die Bezeichnung des angefochtenen Beschlusses sowie die Erklärung enthalten, dass Beschwerde gegen diesen Beschluss eingelegt wird. Soll die Entscheidung nur zum Teil angefochten werden, so ist der Umfang der Anfechtung zu bezeichnen. Die Beschwerde soll begründet werden. Amtsgericht Offenbach am Main, den 05.08.2026

Official announcement pursuant to § 9 InsO. Names of natural persons have been removed. Source: insolvenzbekanntmachungen.de.

Company profile

AI-generated dossier

Deal windowAct nowNotice published 46 days ago

Proceedings opened. From here every week costs the estate money, which is why going-concern sales usually run between opening and the report meeting. This is the real buying window.

Typical sequence under the German InsO; not legal advice and not a statement about this case. The administrator runs the process.

The full dossier sets out what the company does, what is sellable, and what went wrong. Register free to keep reading.

Synthesised from Handelsregister, Bundesanzeiger, §9 notice, web presence and news.

Continue reading — free

Key deadlines

Report meeting · buyer window
§§ 29, 156–157 InsO — the creditors' meeting decides continue vs. liquidate. Going-concern sales usually close before it.
Claim deadline · creditors'
§174 InsO — deadline for creditors to lodge claims. Not a buyer's date.
Verification meeting · creditors'
§§ 29, 176 InsO — verification of the lodged claims. A creditors' date.
External sourcesExtra verification sources — deep-linked to the right view when possible.
Administration

Administrator dossier

Florian Bandrack LL.M.
Firm: Baker Tilly Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH
Contact details (phone, email, address)

Register for free to see the administrator's phone, email and office address.

Show contact — free registration

Does this company match your search?

Score the fit against your buyer profile — sector, region, size, deal structure.

Your personal match score for this company

Create a free buyer profile in 60 seconds and see instantly how well this company fits your sector, region and deal size.

Create buyer profile — free
What an asset deal actually carries

Buying out of an insolvency estate is an asset deal: you buy individual assets and rights, not the company. This is the checklist experienced buyers work through before they bid. We do not hold the answers for this proceeding — they come from the administrator.

  • Which assets already belong, economically, to somebody else?

    Not known — ask the administrator

    Retention of title, security assignment and leasing are the most common reason the machine in the photo is not part of the sale. The administrator may only realise what belongs to the estate (§§ 47, 51 InsO). Ask for the list of third-party claims before you value anything.

  • Are the premises part of the estate, or does everything hang on the landlord?

    Not known — ask the administrator

    With leased premises the landlord decides whether the lease transfers to you. For a location-bound business, a site you may not keep IS the deal. Establish ownership, remaining term, termination rights and the landlord's consent — in writing, before you bid.

  • Are the permits attached to the business or to a person?

    Not known — ask the administrator

    Licences, hospitality permits, Handwerksrolle registration, § 34c GewO permits, healthcare and transport approvals: some transfer with the business, others are attached to a natural person and lapse with them. For a regulated trade, a permit matrix is the first step, not the last.

  • Who actually owns the brand, the domain, the shop and the customer data?

    Not known — ask the administrator

    Domains are frequently registered to a shareholder or an agency rather than to the company, and trademarks are sometimes licensed in from a holding entity. Without the domain and the mark you are buying inventory, not a business. Customer data needs a separate data-protection assessment — a customer base is not a chattel.

  • § 613a BGB: which employment relationships come with the assets?

    Not known — ask the administrator

    Taking over a business or part of one means stepping into the existing employment contracts, insolvency or not. What insolvency changes is liability for OLD obligations: for claims that arose before the proceeding opened, settled BAG case law says the buyer does not carry them. The social plan is capped by § 123 InsO at 2.5 monthly salaries per employee, and at one third of the estate that would otherwise be distributed. Model headcount × monthly salary × 2.5 as the ceiling, then test the one-third limit against the estate.

  • Which contracts does the business need in order to still run on Monday?

    Not known — ask the administrator

    Under § 103 InsO the administrator elects whether to perform contracts neither side has completed, and in an asset deal customer and supplier contracts transfer only with the counterparty's consent. Ask which five contracts the business cannot run without — ERP, payment provider, fulfilment, key supplier, key customer — and settle novation before closing.

Why buying from the estate is cleaner than an ordinary acquisition

  • § 75(2) AO — the successor's liability for the predecessor's business taxes expressly does not apply to an acquisition out of an insolvency estate. Buying a healthy company, that is one of the largest risks you carry.
  • § 25 HGB — successor liability on continuing the trade name is routinely excluded on an acquisition from the estate, and on the prevailing view does not attach in the first place; put the exclusion in the contract regardless.
  • Pre-opening employment liabilities do not travel with the buyer under settled BAG case law — the running business transfers, the debts stay in the estate.

General information on German law. Not legal advice, and not a statement about this company. For the actual case only the administrator and the purchase agreement decide.

Similar proceedings

Similar proceedings

More proceedings in the same sector
See all →

Questions & guidance

Frequently asked questions

Is robot-machining GmbH insolvent?+

Insolvency proceedings concerning robot-machining GmbH were opened on 2026-08-05 at the Offenbach am Main (case no. 8 IN 122/26).

Which court handles the insolvency of robot-machining GmbH and what is the case number?+

The competent court is the Offenbach am Main. The proceedings are conducted under case number 8 IN 122/26.

What is the company registration number of robot-machining GmbH?+

robot-machining GmbH is recorded in the official register under HRB HRB 47609.

Who is the insolvency administrator of robot-machining GmbH?+

Florian Bandrack LL.M. (Baker Tilly Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH), Frankfurt am Main was appointed by the court as insolvency administrator. Buyers and creditors contact the administrator directly.

Can robot-machining GmbH or its assets be acquired?+

In many insolvency proceedings the business operations or individual assets are sold via a transferring restructuring (asset deal). Interested buyers approach the appointed insolvency administrator; the official facts and deadlines above are the starting point.

What now? Buyer's guide

How does an insolvency asset deal work? What deadlines matter? When is the best moment to talk to the administrator?